Discovery first. Measurement second.

A study is only as good as the questions it starts from.

Interviews and surveys go deep on the questions you bring. Discovery finds the ones you did not bring. It runs first, before the discussion guide and the questionnaire are written.

Two phases.

Phase one

Discovery

Ours.

What we do
We collect what people say to each other about your category, over months or years, in forums, communities, reviews and comment threads. We keep reading until new sources stop adding anything new.
What we look for
Where the conversation differs from the assumptions in your brief. A group you had not counted. A meaning the category does not use. A word people use that your questionnaire does not.
What you receive
The Question Set. It holds what we found, the vocabulary people use, and the questions it raises for your qualitative and quantitative work.

Phase two

Measurement

Yours, your agency's or ours.

What happens
The questions go into interviews, a survey or a tracker.
What it adds
Size, proportion and behaviour, which reading conversation cannot give.
Who does it
Your insight team, your research agency, or Bakamo's own quantitative team.

Researchers call this an exploratory sequential design: qualitative discovery builds the instrument, and quantitative work measures. What we change is the material for the first phase.

What each kind of research is for.

Discovery (Bakamo)Interviews and groupsSurvey
Starts fromWhat people already say to each otherYour discussion guideYour questionnaire
Best atFinding what nobody asked aboutDepth on a question you bringSize and proportion
CannotSize it, or test what does not exist yetReturn a topic the guide did not openReturn an answer you did not list
You leave withQuestionsExplanationsNumbers

Where the method comes from.

Finding and testing are different jobs, and research has long treated them separately. Our method belongs to the finding side.

Charles S. Peirceabduction
You meet a surprising fact and reason to the explanation that would make it unsurprising. Peirce held that this is the step that brings in a new idea.
John Tukeyexploratory analysis
Look at the material before you hold a hypothesis, to see what is there.
Glaser and Straussgrounded theory
Categories come out of the material. They are not set in advance.
Kenneth Pikeemic and etic
The categories people use themselves differ from the researcher's. We report the first kind.
Hans-Georg Gadamerhermeneutics
Reading is interpretation, and interpretation needs a trained reader.
Niklas Luhmannsystems theory
Meaning forms in communication between people, so that is where we read.Why we read the way we do →

Medicine works the same way. A clinical trial measures the effects its designers chose in advance. Effects nobody anticipated are found later, in reports from doctors and patients, and then go back into a study.

Our social theory

The thinking behind our methodology.

Our methodology is an argument made of other people's ideas. It holds for every study we have run, with or without The Reading Machine. These are the sixteen thinkers it leans on, who shaped whom, and what each one gives the work.

The discourse, as we read it.

Who taught whom, who argued, and where ideas rhyme across traditions. Hover a name to see its corner of the web; click it to read about the thinker.

DIALOGUEHERMENEUTICSLANGUAGECULTURESYSTEMSTHE EMPIRICAL LINEphenomenology's teacherhis most influential studenthis student at Marburgthe hermeneutic inheritancehorizon becomes narrativedialogue as understandingread as edifying, not systematiclanguage-games become vocabulariesmeaning is publicsemiology's foundationthe map/territory warningthe frame ideadifference as informationthe calculus of distinctionthe taken-for-granted, read sociologicallyrules become practical sensepublished in Bourdieu's series, Le Sens communculture is public — and in mindsno web of meaning is sealedagainst the pyramidadministrative vs critical research'public opinion does not exist'Personal Influence, togetherthe long collaborationtwo floors, two systemsmyth and doxa: the made passing as the givenstory-shapes as cultural modelsperformed selves carry influencethe space between peoplethe space of appearance; the presented selfmodels cross borders and come back changedBuberArendtHusserlHeideggerGadamerRicoeurRortySaussureWittgensteinBarthesGeertzShoreBhabhaGoffmanBourdieuKorzybskiBatesonSpencer-BrownLuhmannMaslowMax-NeefAdornoLazarsfeldKatzKahnemanTversky

taughtinfluencedworked togetherargued againstrhyme — a conceptual echo, not a lineage

The thinkers.

Click a portrait to read what each one saw, what our method takes from it, and why it makes us more sure.

Sketches, not likenesses.

Two ways to work with us.

Option A

Discovery for your study

We deliver the Question Set. Your team or your agency runs the interviews and the survey.

Option B

Discovery and survey

We deliver the Question Set, then build and field the survey and report the results.

Start with the study you are planning